LYLES
v.
BETO, CORRECTIONS DIRECTOR
LYLES
BETO, CORRECTIONS DIRECTOR
379 U.S. 648
Supreme Court of the United States (1965)
Negative Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for reconsideration in light of Massiah v. United States, 377 U. S. 201.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Harley McLAIN v. Meier, 637 F.2d 1159 (8th Cir. 1980)…her candidates); Krasnoff v. Hardy, supra, 436 F.Supp. 304 (approving the placement of party lever over major party columns while no party lever was provided for nomination paper candidates); Voorhes v. Dempsey, 231 F.Supp. 975 (D.Conn.1964), aff’d, 379 U.S. 648, 85 S.Ct. 612, 13 L.Ed.2d 552 (1965) (approving mandatory party lever); Voltaggio v. Caputo, 210 F.Supp. 337 (D.N.J.1962), app. dismissed, 371 U.S. 232, 83 S.Ct. 325, 9 L.Ed.2d 494 (1963) (approving top ballot placement for political party candidate…
-
McKenzie Davis v. Burke, 408 F.2d 779 (7th Cir. 1969)…(1968) (Marshall, J., dissenting).37 Finally, the majority here relies on Lyles v. Beto, 329 F. 2d 332 (5th Cir. 1964) and its restricted interpretation of Lee v. United States, 322 F. 2d 770 (5th Cir. 1963). It should be noted that Lyles v. Beto, 379 U.S. 648, 85 S.Ct. 613, 13 L.Ed.2d 552 (1965) (per curiam), reversed the determination of the Fifth Circuit. The sole case cited for reversal was Massiah. On the state of this record and on my understanding of the rule in Massiah, I would reverse. . See In…1 / 2
Authorities Cited
- Massiah v. United States, 377 U.S. 201 (U.S. 1964)