KATZENBACH, ACTING ATTORNEY GENERAL, ET AL.
v.
MCCLUNG ET AL.
KATZENBACH, ACTING ATTORNEY GENERAL, ET AL.
MCCLUNG ET AL.
379 U.S. 802
Supreme Court of the United States (1964)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Katzenbach v. McCLUNG, 379 U.S. 294 (U.S. 1964)…y a three-judge.United States District Court and an injunction was issued restraining appellants from enforcing the Act against the restaurant. 233 F. Supp. 815. On direct appeal, 28 U. S. C. §§ 1252, 1253 (1958 ed.), we noted probable jurisdiction. 379 U. S. 802. We now reverse the judgment. 1. The Motion to Dismiss. The appellants moved in the District Court to dismiss the complaint for want of equity jurisdiction and that claim is pressed here. The grounds are that the Act authorizes only preventive rel…