DOUGLAS

v.

ALABAMA

Citator

Cited By

• Pointer v. Texas, 380 U.S. 400 (U.S. 1965)
  …ion, rejecting his contention that use of the transcript to convict him denied him rights guaranteed by the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments. 375 á. W. 2d 293. We granted certiorari to consider the important constitutional question the case involves. 379 U. S. 815. In this Court we do not find it necessary to decide one aspect of the question petitioner raises, that is, whether failure to appoint counsel to represent him at the preliminary hearing unconstitutionally denied him the assistance of counsel withi…
• Douglas v. Alabama, 380 U.S. 415 (U.S. 1965)
  …s counsel had “stopped objecting" and that in that circumstance, “the failure to object was waiver.” 42 Ala. App., at 329, 332, 163 So. 2d, at 493, 495. The Supreme Court of Alabama denied review, 276 Ala. 703, 163 So. 2d 496. We granted certiorari, 379 U. S. 815. We reverse. I. We decide today that the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment is applicable to the States. Pointer v. Texas, ante, p. 400. Our cases construing the clause hold that a primary interest secured by it is the right of cross-exa…
• United States v. Indiviglio, 352 F.2d 276 (2d Cir. 1965)
  …existing at the time of the trial, objection would have been futile and when error was asserted on review on the basis of a subsequent appellate decision. United [*281] States ex rel. Angelet v. Fay, 333 F. 2d 12, 16 (2d Cir. 1964) (en bane), aff’d, 379 U.S. 815, 85 S.Ct. 126, 13 L.Ed.2d 28 (1965); see White v. State of Maryland, 373 U.S. 59, 83 S.Ct. 1050, 10 L.Ed.2d 193 (1963); United Brotherhood of Carpenters, etc. v. United States, 330 U.S. 395, 411-412, 67 S.Ct. 775, 91 L.Ed. 973 (1947). Similarly, it…