ARMSTRONG

v.

MANZO ET UX.

Citator

Cited By

• Armstrong v. Manzo et ux., 380 U.S. 545 (U.S. 1965)
  …ee without notice to the petitioner had deprived him “of his child without due process of law.” The appellate court affirmed the trial court’s judgment,6 and the Supreme Court of Texas refused an application for writ of error. We granted certiorari. 379 U. S. 816. The questions before us are whether failure to notify the petitioner of the pendency of the adoption proceedings deprived him [*550] of due process of law so as to render the adoption decree constitutionally invalid, and, if so, whether the subsequ…
• Agrashell, Inc. v. Bernard Sirotta Co., 344 F.2d 583 (2d Cir. 1965)
  …before the district court was documentary, we do not feel limited by the findings below on these factual questions. See 5 Moore, Federal Practice ¶ 52.04 (1964); Miller v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 327 F. 2d 846, 849 (2 Cir.), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 816, 85 S.Ct. 32, 13 L.Ed.2d 28 (1964). We agree with the district court that the evidence contained in Sirotta’s exhibits, standing alone, did not necessarily justify denial of Hammons’s motion to dismiss. However, we feel that Sirotta did present ev…
• United Brands Co. v. Thad Melson, 594 F.2d 1068 (5th Cir. 1979)
  …der 33 U.S.C. § 913(a) under § 913(d). We need not reach this determination. See Ingalls Shipbuilding Division v. Hollinhead, 571 F. 2d 272 (5 Cir. 1978); Wilson v. Donovan, 218 F.Supp. 944 (E.D.La.1963), aff'd, 328 F. 2d 313 (5 Cir.), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 816, 85 S.Ct. 31, 13 L.Ed.2d 28 (1964). Section 913(d) reads: Where recovery is denied to any person, in a suit brought at law or in admiralty to recover damages in respect of injury or death, on the ground that such person was an employee and that th…

  ← 1 / 2 →