COMMERCE CO., DOING BUSINESS AS LAMAR HOTEL

v.

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD

Citator

Cited By (29 total)

• Brotherhood OF Railroad Trainmen v. The Akron & Barberton Belt R.R. Co., 385 F.2d 581 (D.C. Cir. 1967)
  …es, it presents different questions and is being considered separately. See Bangor & A.R.R. v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen, 255 F.Supp. 476 (D. D.C.1966). . Compare Manning v. American Airlines, Inc., 329 F. 2d 32, 34 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 817, 85 S.Ct. 33, 13 L.Ed. 2d 29 (1984). See also Manning v. American Airlines, Inc., 221 F.Supp. 301 (S.D.N.Y.1963). . National Woodwork Mfrs. Ass’n v. NLRB, 386 U.S. 612, 649, 87 S.Ct. 1250, 1271, 18 L.Ed.2d 357 (April 17, 1967). . Manning v. Americ…
• Brotherhood of Railway v. REA Express, Inc., 523 F.2d 164 (2d Cir. 1975)
  …tive bargaining agreement, pending completion of which the carrier must maintain the status quo, even if the agreement has expired. See Manning v. American Airlines, Inc., 221 F.Supp. 301 (S.D.N.Y.1963), aff’d., 329 F. 2d 32 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 817, 85 S.Ct. 33, 13 L.Ed.2d 29 (1964). Section 6 requires that at least thirty days’ written notice be given of any intended changes in rates of pay, rules or working conditions and it requires conferences to be held with respect to the changes. The R…
• Int'l Ass'n OF MacHinists & Aerospace Workers, AFL-CIO v. Aloha Airlines, Inc., 776 F.2d 812 (9th Cir. 1985)
  …Agreement, or the inclusion of a renewal provision in the Basic Agreement, has no effect on both Agreements’ potential ability to provide the terms of the status quo. See Manning v. American Airlines, Inc., 329 F. 2d 32, 34 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 817, 85 S.Ct. 33, 13 L.Ed.2d 29 (1964). As we noted earlier, the determination of the precise terms of the status quo remains initially a matter for the district court.…