TEXAS STATE AFL-CIO ET AL.

v.

KENNEDY, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (39 total)

• Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Armcor Indus., Inc., 535 F.2d 239 (3d Cir. 1976)
  …[the employer’s conduct] may reasonably tend to coerce or intimidate employees in the exercise of rights protected under the Act.” Local 542, International Union of Operating Engineers v. N.L.R.B., 328 F. 2d 850, 852-3 (3d Cir. 1964), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 826, 85 S.Ct. 161, 13 L.E.2d 93 (1964). See N.L.R.B. v. Burnup & Sims, Inc., 379 U.S. 21, 23-4, 85 S.Ct. 171, 172-73, 13 L.Ed.2d 1, 3-4 (1964). Whether an employer’s actions meet that test is a question of fact for the Board and its determinations are c…
• Hedstrom Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 629 F.2d 305 (3d Cir. 1980)
  …Chemical Company v. U. S. E. P. A., 605 F. 2d 673, 681 (3d Cir. 1979). . NLRB v. Armcor Industries, Inc., 535 F. 2d at 242, (quoting Local 542, International Union of Operating Engineers v. NLRB, 328 F. 2d 850, 852-53 (3d Cir. 1964), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 826, 85 S.Ct. 52, 13 L.Ed.2d 35 (1964)). . Hedstrom Co. v. NLRB, Hedstrom I, 558 F. 2d at 1143, n. 13; NLRB v. Armcor Industries, Inc., 535 F. 2d at 242. . Hedstrom Co. v. NLRB, Hedstrom I, 558 F. 2d at 1142 n. 12; Landis Tool Co., Div. of Litton Indu…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Eagle Material Handling, Inc., 558 F.2d 160 (3d Cir. 1977)
  …could not have been a violation of section 8(a)(1). This suggestion misperceives the showing necessary to make out an 8(a)(1) violation. As we said in Local 542, Int’l Union of Operating Eng’rs v. NLRB, 328 F. 2d 850, 852-53 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 826, 85 S.Ct. 52, 13 L.Ed.2d 35 (1964), The fact that no one was in fact coerced or intimidated is of no relevance. The test of coercion is not whether the misconduct proves effective. The test is whether the misconduct is such that, under the circumst…