PULLIAM

v.

COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE

Citator

Cited By (12 total)

• In re Boston & Me. Corp., 719 F.2d 493 (1st Cir. 1983)
  …, but in light of the nature of each claim and the equities of the case before it. In re Penn Central Transportation Co., 358 F.Supp. at 170; In re Leeds Homes, Inc., 222 F.Supp. 20, 33 (E.D.Tenn. 1963), aff’d 332 F. 2d 648 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 836, 85 S.Ct. 71, 13 L.Ed.2d 43 (1964); see also In re Magnus Harmonica Corp., 262 F. 2d 515, 518 (3d Cir.1959). At all times the reorganization court must be guided by the basic equitable principle announced in Vanston: It is manifest that the touchst…
• Johns-Manville Corp. v. Cement Asbestos Prods. Co., 428 F.2d 1381 (5th Cir. 1970)
  …g the ends of pipes. It was granted to J-M as assignee of the inventor, Robert Heisler. The validity of this patent has previously been considered by this Court in Italit, Inc. v. Johns-Manville Corporation, 5 Cir. 1964, 331 F. 2d 663, cert. denied, 379 U.S. 836, 85 S.Ct. 71, 13 L.Ed. 2d 43, There we held the patent valid but not infringed by a coupling which worked on a V-ring principle. In that litigation, however, neither the Bell coupling nor other couplings considered by the District Court in this case…
• Schweitzer v. Consol. Rail Corp. (Conrail) & the Reading Co., 758 F.2d 936 (3d Cir. 1985)
  …nston Bondholders Protective Committee v. Green, 329 U.S. 156, 170, 67 S.Ct. 237, 243, 91 L.Ed. 162 (Frankfurter, J., concurring). See Tate v. National Acceptance Company (In re Leeds Homes, Inc.), 332 F. 2d 648, 649-50 (6th Cir.1964), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 836, 85 S.Ct. 71, 13 L.Ed.2d 43 (1964). Since plaintiffs’ personal injury actions arise under F.E.L.A., any “claims” plaintiffs may have had prior to the consummation dates would have been based on the federal tort law provided pursuant to that statute.…