W. R. B. CORP. ET AL.

v.

GEER, DOING BUSINESS AS ODELL GEER CO., ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (18 total)

• Pope v. United States, 372 F.2d 710 (8th Cir. 1967)
  …on other grounds 362 U.S. 402, 80 S.Ct. 788, 4 L.Ed.2d 824; Dusky v. United States, supra, p. 759 of 295 F. 2d. We adhered to this rejection in Feguer, p. 243 of 302 F. 2d. See Carter v. United States, 332 F. 2d 728, 729 (8 Cir. 1964), cert. denied 379 U.S. 841, 85 S.Ct. 79, 13 L.Ed.2d 47. 2. The origin, history, application, and variations of M’Naghten have been reviewed in detail adequately and at length in many places, as, for example, Durham v. United States, supra, pp. 869-874 of 214 F. 2d, and Unite…
• Lincoln v. Bd. OF Regents OF THE Univ. Sys. OF Ga., 697 F.2d 928 (11th Cir. 1983)
  …ce supports a finding, we must consider the evidence as a whole and set the finding aside if we are “left with the impression it is not the truth and right of the case”. W.R.B. Corporation v. Geer, 5 Cir.1963, 313 F. 2d 750, 753, cert. denied, 1964, 379 U.S. 841, 85 S.Ct. 78, 13 L.Ed.2d 47. Still, “[a] finding is clearly erroneous and reversible under Rule 52(a) only when ‘the reviewing court on the entire evidence is [*940] left with a definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed’ William…
• SUN Banks OF Fla., Inc. v. SUN Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass'n, 651 F.2d 311 (5th Cir. 1981)
  …although there is evidence to support it, the reviewing court on the entire evidence is left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed.”); W. R. B. Corporation v. Geer, 313 F. 2d 750, 753 (5th Cir. 1963), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 841, 85 S.Ct. 78, 13 L.Ed.2d 47 (1964) (“the clearly erroneous concept of Fed.R.Civ.P. 52(a) requires findings to be set aside if the Court is left with the impression that the result is not the truth and right of the case”). In arriving at our conclusi…