WAINWRIGHT, CORRECTIONS DIRECTOR

v.

CULLINS ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (65 total)

• State v. Hipolito Barreiro, 432 So. 2d 138 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983)
  …42 (6th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 969, 97 S.Ct. 1652, 52 L.Ed.2d 361 (1977); Beverly v. United States, 468 F. 2d 732 (5th Cir. 1972); In re Russo, 448 F. 2d 369 (9th Cir. 1971); United States v. Dardi, 330 F. 2d 316 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 845, 85 S.Ct. 50, 13 L.Ed.2d 50 (1964), that proposition is bottomed on the propositions that a grand jury is not an arm of the prosecution to be used by it for its exclusive purposes, see United States v. Pack, 150 F.Supp. 262 (D.Del.), appeal dismisse…
• Agrella v. The Honorable Leonard Rivkind, 404 So. 2d 1113 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981)
  …see, e. g., Beverly v. United States, 468 F. 2d 732 (5th Cir. 1972); United States v. Doe, 455 F. 2d 1270 (1st Cir. 1972); In re September Grand Jury, 454 F. 2d 580 (7th Cir. 1971); United States v. Dardi, 330 F. 2d 316 (2d Cir. 1964), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 845, 85 S.Ct. 50, 13 L.Ed.2d 50 (1964), for the proposition that the Grand Jury may not be used as a tool of discovery for a pending case. His reliance is misplaced. First, those very cases hold there is no abuse of the grand jury function unless it can…
• Holloway v. Arkansas, 435 U.S. 475 (U.S. 1978)
  …When an untimely motion for separate counsel is made for dilatory purposes, our holding does not impair the trial court’s ability to [*487] deal with counsel who resort to such tactics. Cf. United States v. Dardi, 330 F. 2d 316 (CA2), cert. denied, 379 U. S. 845 (1964); People v. Kroeger, 61 Cal. 2d 236, 390 P. 2d 369 (1964). Nor does our holding preclude a trial court from exploring the adequacy of the basis of defense counsel’s representations regarding a conflict of interests without improperly requiring…