ROBINSON

v.

CELEBREZZE, SECRETARY OF HEALTH, EDUCATION AND WELFARE

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Nolan, 416 F.2d 588 (10th Cir. 1969)
  …r false.” . Fitts v. United States, 10 Cir., 284 F. 2d 108, 110, 111; Grandsinger v. United States, 10 Cir., 332 F. 2d 80, 82; Seefeldt v. United States, 10 Cir., 183 F. 2d 713, 715; Fitts v. United States, 10 Cir., 328 F. 2d 844, 846, cert. denied 379 U.S. 851, 85 S.Ct. 96, 13 L.Ed.2d 55. . Griffin v. California, 380 U.S. 609, 611, 612, 85 S.Ct. 1229, 14 L.Ed.2d 106; Cloud v. United States, 8 Cir., 361 F. 2d 627, 630. . Griffin v. California, 380 U.S. 609, 614, 85 S.Ct. 1229. . Silber v. United States,…
• United States v. Adalberto Cervantes-Pacheco, 800 F.2d 452 (5th Cir. 1986)
  …onable suspicion may justify the use of a contingency fee. Harris v. United States, 400 F. 2d 264, 266 (5th Cir.1968); Sears v. United States, 343 F. 2d 139, 144 (5th Cir.1965); Hill v. United States, 328 F. 2d 988, 989 (5th Cir.1964), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 851, 85 S.Ct. 94, 13 L.Ed.2d 54 (1964); see Williamson, 311 F. 2d at 444. But we have also recognized that reasonable suspicion, standing alone, may not be enough to justify an otherwise impermissible contingency fee. Rather, in order to justify the fe…
• United States v. Adalberto Cervantes-Pacheco, 793 F.2d 689 (5th Cir. 1986)
  …fied in contracting with Moya on a contingent fee basis____ Without some such justification or explanation, we cannot sanction a contingent fee agreement____ 311 F. 2d at 444. In Hill v. United States, 328 F. 2d 988, 989 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 851 (1964), we found that the justification suggested by Williamson was met “when the government showed, as it did here that (1) the accused had a past record (in this case there were past convictions for the same offense), and (2) that neighbors had in…

  ← 1 / 2 →