L. Y. DOUGLAS, APPELLANT,

v.

CITY OF DUNEDIN, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• In re Guardianship OF Georgina H. Read v. Kenefick, 555 So. 2d 869 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989)
  …erely doing what any daughter does, see In re: Guardianship of Ivarsson, 60 Wash.2d 733, 375 P. 2d 509 (1962), and that a guardian should not be [*871] paid for services outside the scope of his duties as a guardian, Poling v. City Bank & Trust Co., 189 So. 2d 176 (Fla.2d DCA 1966). In this case, however, Mrs. Kenefick not only presented time records to the court but also testified concerning the necessity and scope of the services she performed on behalf of her mother. Based upon the records and testimony, t…
• In re Guardianship OF Sara H. Sapp. Lee O'Hare & Lynn Atherton v. Lalai Hamric, 868 So. 2d 687 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004)
  …o. 2d 307, 308-09 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996). A guardian is not entitled to compensation for sendees rendered outside the scope of his or her appointment. In re Guardianship of Jansen, 405 So. 2d at 1077; Poling v. City Bank & Trust Co. of St. Petersburg, 189 So. 2d 176, 182-83 (Fla. 2d DCA 1966). This principle has been applied in cases involving guardians who have been in a close familial relationship with the Ward. Under such circumstances, the guardian of the person is not entitled to compensation for merely do…
• Jolly H. Rogers v. Rogers, 229 So. 2d 618 (Fla. 2d DCA 1969)
  …ved the legal effect of our holding in Knight, we are hesitant to fix the terms of a modified order ourselves, as we undoubtedly have the right to do under F.S. § 59.34 F.S.A. (see Poling v. City Bank & Trust Company of St. Petersburg, Fla.App.1966, 189 So. 2d 176, 185), or even to suggest what modification, if any, should be made by the Chancellor. We prefer, in the present state of the record, that the lower Court determine initially whether such modification should be made in the light of this opinion, and…

Authorities Cited

• Hancock v. Wilford J. Piper and Alida Piper, 186 So. 2d 489 (Fla. 1966)