MEE
v.
UNITED STATES; LOPEZ V. TEXAS; RAYMOND V. PENNSYLVANIA; PARHAM V. CALIFORNIA; SMITH V. UNITED STATES; REYNOLDS V. NEW JERSEY; HERB V. WAINWRIGHT, CORRECTIONS DIRECTOR; ROGERS V. UNITED STATES; WILSON V. ILLINOIS; MILLER V. UNITED STATES; AHLSTEDT V. UNITED STATES; BERRY V. WARDEN, QUEENS HOUSE OF DETENTION; REYNOLDS V. NEW JERSEY; GAWANTKA V. UNITED STATES; WILLIAMS V. SOUTH CAROLINA; MORRIS V. SOUTH CAROLINA; FISHER V. UNITED STATES
MEE
UNITED STATES; LOPEZ V. TEXAS; RAYMOND V. PENNSYLVANIA; PARHAM V. CALIFORNIA; SMITH V. UNITED STATES; REYNOLDS V. NEW JERSEY; HERB V. WAINWRIGHT, CORRECTIONS DIRECTOR; ROGERS V. UNITED STATES; WILSON V. ILLINOIS; MILLER V. UNITED STATES; AHLSTEDT V. UNITED STATES; BERRY V. WARDEN, QUEENS HOUSE OF DETENTION; REYNOLDS V. NEW JERSEY; GAWANTKA V. UNITED STATES; WILLIAMS V. SOUTH CAROLINA; MORRIS V. SOUTH CAROLINA; FISHER V. UNITED STATES
379 U.S. 873
Supreme Court of the United States (1964)
Caution
Cited by 8 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Haggard v. United States, 369 F.2d 968 (8th Cir. 1966)…States, 8 Cir., 324 F. 2d 775, cert. den. 377 U.S. 999, 84 S.Ct. 1935, 12 L.Ed.2d 1049; Golliher v. United States, 8 Cir., 362 F. 2d 594; Mee v. United States, 8 Cir., 316 F. 2d 467, cert. den. 377 U.S. 997, 84 S.Ct. 1923, 12 L.Ed.2d 1049, reh. den. 379 U.S. 873, 85 S.Ct. 20, 13 L.Ed.2d 80; Costello v. United States, 8 Cir., 255 F. 2d 389, cert. den. 358 U.S. 830, 79 S.Ct. 51, 3 L.Ed.2d 69, reh. den. 358 U.S. 901, 79 S.Ct. 220, 3 L.Ed.2d 152; Kansas City Star Co. v. United States, 8 Cir., 240 F. 2d 643. Thi…
-
United States v. Hoffman, 385 F.2d 501 (7th Cir. 1967)…serve to distinguish the evidentiary character of a witness from the relative immutability of inanimate evidence (Smith and Bowden v. United States, 117 U.S.App.D.C. 1, 324 F. 2d 879, cert. den. 377 U.S. 954, 84 S.Ct. 1632, 12 L.Ed.2d 498, reh. den. 379 U.S. 873, 85 S.Ct. 21, 13 L.Ed.2d 80). And the exercise of such attributes can, and under the circumstances here presented do, effect an attenuation dissipating any taint which pervaded the original disclosure of the existence and identity of the witness.…
-
United States v. Wilson, 447 F.2d 1 (9th Cir. 1971)…a remarkably similar factual situation, the Eighth Circuit deemed such a claim of reversible error “frivolous.” Mee v. United States, 316 F. 2d 467, 470 (8th Cir. 1963), cert. denied, 377 U.S. 997, 84 S.Ct. 1923, 12 L.Ed.2d 1049 (1964), reh. denied, 379 U.S. 873, 85 S.Ct. 20, 13 L.Ed.2d 80 (1964). There, the defendant had been charged with conspiracy to commit mail fraud by feigning a burglary and then making false insurance claims. At trial, the government displayed, as an exhibit only, items that had been…
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence