SIMONS

v.

MIAMI BEACH FIRST NATIONAL BANK, EXECUTOR

Citator

Cited By

• Minn. Mining & Mfg. Co. v. N.J. Wood Finishing Co., 381 U.S. 311 (U.S. 1965)
  …§ 5 (b) and that this suit was timely filed. 216 F. Supp. 507. The Court of Appeals affirmed. 332 F. 2d 346. We granted certiorari because of a conflict between circuits7 and the importance of the question in the administration of the Clayton Act. 379 U. S. 877. I. New Jersey Wood is engaged in the manufacture of electrical insulation materials, some of which it sells to independent distributors who, in turn, sell to wire and [*315] cable manufacturers and fabricators. Minnesota Mining is a diversified c…
• Maryland v. United States, 381 U.S. 41 (U.S. 1965)
  …rict of Pennsylvania, and all parties agreed to proceed solely on the record made in the Meyer case. The District Court rendered judgment for petitioners, but the Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit reversed. 329 F. 2d 722. We granted certiorari, 379 U. S. 877, to resolve the conflict between the two Circuits on this single record, and, more broadly, to settle authoritatively the basic question stated at the outset of this opinion which is at the core of other litigation arising out of this same disaster,…
• LEH v. Gen. Petroleum Corp., 382 U.S. 54 (U.S. 1965)
  …statute governed and that plaintiffs were not entitled to the benefit of § 5 (b). 208 F. Supp. 289 (D. C. S. D. Cal. 1962), aff’d, 330 F. 2d 288 (C. A. 9th Cir. 1964). We granted certiorari limited to the question of the applicability of § 5 (b), 379 U. S. 877, because of an apparent conflict between this case and Union Carbide & Carbon Corp. v. Nisley, 300 F. 2d 561 (C. A. 10th Cir. 1962), dismissed under Rule 60 sub nom. Wade v. Union Carbide & Carbon Corp., 371 U. S. 801, concerning interpretation of t…