LAM TAT SIN

v.

ESPERDY, DISTRICT DIRECTOR, IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE

Citator

Cited By

• Brooks v. Beto, 366 F.2d 1 (5th Cir. 1966)
  …el who have sharply defined the issues and presented them with zeal.3 At the heart of the matter, the question facing us is whether we should adhere to Collins v. Walker, 5 Cir., 1964, 329 F. 2d 100, on rehearing, 1964, 335 F. 2d 417, cert. denied, 379 U.S. 901, 85 S.Ct. 189, 13 L.Ed.2d 175. For while the District Judge, conscious of Collins and his obligation to follow it, undertook to distinguish it, we do not think this may fairly be done as to its broad holding and rationale. On re-examination of the p…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Swaaley v. The United States, 376 F.2d 857 (Ct. Cl. 1967)
  …petition here involved. We agree with Judge Fahy’s suggestion that the doctrine of New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, supra, applies to federal employee’s petitions. See Turner v. Kennedy, 118 U.S.App.D.C. 104, 332 F. 2d 304, 307 (1964), cert. denied 379 U.S. 901, 85 S.Ct. 189, 13 L.Ed.2d 175 (dissenting opinion). See also, Dismissals of Public Employees for Petitioning Congress: Administrative Discipline And 5 U.S.C. Section 652(d), 74 Yale L.J. 1156 (1965). Cf. Steck v. Connally, 199 F.Supp. 104 (D.D.C.19…
• United States ex rel. Otis Chestnut v. Crim. Court OF the City OF NEW York, 442 F.2d 611 (2d Cir. 1971)
  …al petit juror list for publicized cases); Beck v. Washington, supra, 369 U.S. at 549-550, 82 S.Ct. 955 (denial of procedural safeguards before grand jury that were provided in other cases); Collins v. Walker, 329 F. 2d 100 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 901, 85 S.Ct. 189, 13 L.Ed.2d 175 (1964) (petit jury chosen with respect to defendant’s race). Of course, a defendant is denied equal protection if he is proceeded against by a grand jury from which members of his own race have been arbitrarily or invi…