STATE, EX REL. JOE SHELBY RILEY,
v.
WM. M. ROWLETT, OF TAMPA; THOS. W. HUTSON, OF MIAMI; S. E. DRISKELL, OF JACKSONVILLE; JAMES E. CRUMP, OF WINTER HAVEN; H. A DAY, OF ORLANDO; J. M. MANN, OF LAKE BUTLER; EUGENE G. PEEK, OF OCALA; C. E. TUMLIN, OF MIAMI; S. G HOLLINGSWORTH, OF BRADENTON; AND J. D. RABORN, OF TRENTON
STATE, EX REL. JOE SHELBY RILEY,
WM. M. ROWLETT, OF TAMPA; THOS. W. HUTSON, OF MIAMI; S. E. DRISKELL, OF JACKSONVILLE; JAMES E. CRUMP, OF WINTER HAVEN; H. A DAY, OF ORLANDO; J. M. MANN, OF LAKE BUTLER; EUGENE G. PEEK, OF OCALA; C. E. TUMLIN, OF MIAMI; S. G HOLLINGSWORTH, OF BRADENTON; AND J. D. RABORN, OF TRENTON
125 Fla. 577
Florida Supreme Court (1936)
Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 170 So. 317
Cited by 9 cases
Opinion of the Court
— In this case the record has been examined and the questions involved found to be identical with those raised in State of Florida, ex rel. Henry Sbordy, v. Wm. M. Rowlett, et al., decided January 15, 1936. It follows that the Writ of Prohibition must be and is hereby awarded on authority of the opinion and judgment in the last mentioned case.
It is' so ordered.
*578Whitfield, C. J., and Terrell, Buford and Davis, J. J., concur.
Brown, J., dissents.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
State ex rel. C. M. Harper v. McDavid, 145 Fla. 605 (Fla. 1941)…of certain properties from taxation for particular public purposes. We have also conceded power in the Legislature to define a municipal purpose as contemplated by the provisions of the Constitution alluded to. Long v. St. John, et al., 126 Fla. 1, 170 So. 317; State v. City of Tallahassee, 142 Fla. 476, 195 So. 402; State ex rel. Gibbs v. Gordon, et al., 138 Fla. 312, 189 So. 437. In at least nine States with constitutional provisions almost identical with the provisions of the Florida Constitution prov…
-
Tamiami Trail Tours, Inc. v. City OF Tampa, 159 Fla. 287 (Fla. 1947)…ized to be imposed by the provisions of Chapter 22829. See Stewart v. State, 119 Fla. 117, 161 So. 378; Harper v. England, 124 Fla. 296, 168 So. 603; American Can Company v. City of Tampa, 152 Fla. 798, 14 So. (2nd) 203; Long v. St. John 126 Fla. 1, 170 So. 317. The tax contemplated under chapter 22829 is not a tax against the property of the appellants but is a tax authorized by the sovereignty imposed for the benefit of the use of a sovereign franchise which all users like situated are required to pay.…
-
Cassady v. Consol. Naval Stores Co., 119 So. 2d 35 (Fla. 1960)…seq., Fla. Stat., F.S.A. This it had the right to do— subject to controlling constitutional limitations — in the exercise of its sovereign power to determine the subjects of taxation and the exemptions therefrom. Long v. St. John, 1936, 126 Fla. 1, 170 So. 317, 109 A.L.R. 809. And under § S of Article 9, Fla.Const, the Legislature may lawfully delegate to counties, acting through their constitutionally authorized and duly elected taxing officials, the authority to assess and impose taxes for county purpos…
Previewing 3 of 9 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence