MARTINEZ

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Denman v. Leedy, 479 F.2d 1097 (6th Cir. 1973)
  …le. As such this court has no jurisdiction to entertain the present suit. In re Burrus, 136 U.S. 586, 10 S. Ct. 850, 34 L.Ed. 500 (1890); Gargallo v. Gargallo, 472 F. 2d 1219 (6th Cir. 1973); Harris v. Turner, 329 F. 2d 918 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 907, 85 S.Ct. 202, 13 L.Ed.2d 180 (1964); Carqueville v. Woodruff, 153 F. 2d 1011 (6th Cir. 1946). Second, the complaint fails to allege a valid cause of action under § 1983. A careful examination of the complaint demonstrates that the only assertion…
• United States v. Bishop, 534 F.2d 214 (10th Cir. 1976)
  …1039, 87 S.Ct. 1494, 18 L.Ed.2d 605 (1967); Cloud v. United States, 361 F. 2d 627 (8th Cir. 1966); See, Griffin v. California, 380 U.S. 609, 85 S.Ct. 1229, 14 L.Ed.2d 106 (1965); United States v. Martinez, 333 F. 2d 80 (2nd Cir. 1964), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 907, 85 S.Ct. 199, 13 L.Ed.2d 178 (1964); See also Ahlstedt v. United States, 315 F. 2d 62 (5th Cir. 1963), cert. denied, 375 U.S. 847, 84 S.Ct. 101, 11 L.Ed.2d 74 (1963). We have held, however, that it is not error for the prosecutor to call the jury’…
• Gray v. Elliot L. Richardson, 474 F.2d 1370 (6th Cir. 1973)
  …State court. Traditionally the states, not the federal government, have been considered the exclusive arbiter of these problems. In re Burrus, 136 U.S. 586, 10 S.Ct. 850, 34 L.Ed. 500 (1890); Harris v. Turner, 329 F. 2d 918 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 907, 85 S.Ct. 202, 13 L.Ed.2d 180 (1964), rehearing denied, 379 U.S. 985, 85 S.Ct. 673, 13 L.Ed.2d 578 (1965); Carqueville v. Woodruff, 153 F. 2d 1011 (6th Cir. 1946). We therefore hold that the Secretary should have accepted the determination made by…