STRITE ET AL., EXECUTORS
v.
MCGINNES, DISTRICT DIRECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE; HIPP V. SMITH ET AL.; JOHNSON V. SHOVLIN, STATE HOSPITAL SUPERINTENDENT; MATTHEWSON ET AL. V. MCCUNE, JUDGE, ET AL.; STELLO V. UNITED STATES; TANSIMORE V. UNITED STATES

U.S. | 1964-11-09
Nos. 258; No. 66; No. 82; No. 85; No. 129; No. 172
379 U.S. 910 Supreme Court of the United States (1964) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Miller v. United States, 387 F.2d 866 (3d Cir. 1968)
    …expenses incidental to her comfort and well-being.” We had occasion not long ago in Strite v. McGinnes, 330 F. 2d 234 (3 Cir. 1964), affirming 215 F.Supp. 513 (E.D.Pa. 1963), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 836, 85 S.Ct. 69, 13 L.Ed.2d 43, rehearing denied 379 U.S. 910, 85 S.Ct. 185, 13 L.Ed.2d 182 (1964), to consider a problem quite similar, although not precisely identical. There the power to consume was exercisable “at any time necessary or advisable in order to provide for the reasonable needs and proper expen…
  • …an ascertainable standard under section 2041(b)(1)(A). See, e.g., Jenkins v. United States, 428 F. 2d 538, 546 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 829, 91 S.Ct. 59, 27 L.Ed.2d 59 (1970); Strite v. McGinnes, 330 F. 2d 234, 240 (3d Cir.), cert. denied. 379 U.S. 910, 85 S.Ct. 185, 13 L.Ed.2d 182 (1964). The decision of the district court is Affirmed. . The appellant relies on two cases to support its position that John Walter's will created an ascertainable standard limiting Mary Walter’s power of appointment…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw