BURNETT

v.

NEW YORK CENTRAL RAILROAD CO.

Citator

Cited By (31 total)

• Burnett v. N.Y. Cent. R.R. Co., 380 U.S. 424 (U.S. 1965)
  …held, “[fjailure to bring the action within the time prescribed [*426] extinguished the cause of action.” 332 F. 2d, at 530. We granted certiorari to determine whether petitioner's suit in the Ohio state court tolled the FELA statute of limitations. 379 U. S. 913. There is no doubt that, as a matter of federal law, the state action here involved was properly “commenced” within the meaning of the federal limitation statute which provides that “no action shall be maintained . . . unless commenced within three…
• United States v. Bisceglia, 420 U.S. 141 (U.S. 1975)
  …es which did not name a specific taxpayer who was under investigation. E. g., United States v. Carter, 489 F. 2d 413 (CA5 1973); United States v. Turner, 480 F. 2d 272, 279 (CA7 1973); Tillotson v. [*149] Boughner, 333 F. 2d 515 (CA7), cert. denied, 379 U. S. 913 (1964). Respondent undertakes to distinguish these cases on the ground that they involved situations in which either a taxpayer was identified or a tax liability was known to exist as to an unidentified taxpayer. However, while they serve to suggest…
• Grigsby v. Coastal Marine Serv. OF Tex., Inc., 412 F.2d 1011 (5th Cir. 1969)
  …1964 A.M.C. 1075; Ferrante v. Swedish American Lines, 3 Cir., 1964, 331 F. 2d 571, 1964 A.M.C. 2268, cert. denied, 379 U.S. 801, 85 S.Ct. 10, 13 L.Ed.2d 20; Thompson v. Calmar S.S. Corp., 3 Cir., 1964, 331 F. 2d 657, 1964 A.M.C. 2249, cert. denied, 379 U.S. 913, 85 S.Ct. 259, 13 L.Ed.2d 184; Blassingill v. Waterman S.S. Corp., 9 Cir., 1964, 336 F. 2d 367, 1964 A.M.C. 1932: Bue, Admiralty Law in the Fifth Circuit—A Compendium for Practitioners: I, 4 Hous.L.Rev. 350, 397-399 (1966). . United States v. Secki…