SMITH ET AL.

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (17 total)

• United States v. Dennis, 625 F.2d 782 (8th Cir. 1980)
  …equest to introduce prior consistent statements is properly granted to the extent that they relate to the same subject matter as prior inconsistent statements used for impeachment. United States v. Smith, 328 F. 2d 848, 850 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 936, 85 S.Ct. 336, 13 L.Ed.2d 346 (1964). A prior consistent statement may not be introduced, however, simply to bolster the testimony of the witness at trial. United States v. Allen, 579 F. 2d 531, 532-33 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 933, 99 S.…
• United States v. Hoffa, 349 F.2d 20 (6th Cir. 1965)
  …regard the interception as preventing a retrial of the case. The same is true in Caldwell where a new trial was ordered. In Martin v. United States, 335 F. 2d 945 (C.A. 9, 1964) and United States v. Guerra, 334 F. 2d 138 (C.A. 2,1964) cert. denied 379 U.S. 936, 85 S.Ct. 337, 13 L.Ed.2d 346, the Courts held that illegal conduct occurring at the first trial did not taint all subsequent proceedings. United States v. McGavic, supra; Rogers v. United States, 330 F. 2d 535 (C.A. 5, 1964) cert. denied 379 U.S. 9…
• United States v. Cochran, 499 F.2d 380 (5th Cir. 1974)
  …n only a portion of it has been used by an opponent,” thus giving the trier of fact a complete understanding of the tenor and effect of the statement in its proper context, United States v. Smith, 6 Cir. 1964, 328 F. 2d 848, 850, cert. denied, 1964, 379 U.S. 936, 85 S.Ct. 336, 13 L.Ed.2d 346; United States v. Lev, 2 Cir. 1960, 276 F. 2d 605, 608, cert. denied, 1960, 363 U.S. 812, 80 S.Ct. 1248, 4 L.Ed.2d 1153; Short v. United States, 9 Cir. 1959, 271 F. 2d 73, 78, cert. denied, 1960, 361 U.S. 948, 80 S.Ct.…