DIXON ET AL.

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Dixon v. United States, 381 U.S. 68 (U.S. 1965)
  …ncies, and in this suit for refund the United States prevailed in the District Court for the Southern District of New York, 224 P. Supp. 358, and in the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, 333 F. 2d 1016. We brought the case here on certiorari, 379 U. S. 943, to resolve a conflict with United States v. Midland-Ross Corp., supra. We affirm. Our holding today in Midland-Boss that original issue discount is not entitled to capital gains treatment under the 1939 Internal Revenue Code requires that we affir…
• Atl. Ref. Co. v. Fed. Trade Comm'n, 381 U.S. 357 (U.S. 1965)
  …the system [used by Atlantic and Goodyear] as a tying arrangement,” it agreed with the Commission that it injured “competition in the distribution of TBA at the manufacturing, wholesale, and retail levels.” 331 F. 2d 394,402. We granted certiorari, 379 U. S. 943, because of the importance of the questions raised and especially in light of the holding of the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in Texaco, Inc. v. Federal Trade Comm’n, 118 U. S. App. D. C. 366, 336 F. 2d 754, which is in ap…