SHAW

v.

NEW YORK

Citator

Cited By (54 total)

• United States v. Addonizio, 451 F.2d 49 (3d Cir. 1971)
  …is itself sufficient under Rule 7(c) and Hagner, it follows a fortiori that the substantive counts are sufficient as well. B. Multiplicity Relying heavily on this court’s decision in United States v. Provenzano, 334 F. 2d 678 (3d Cir.), cert. den. 379 U.S. 947, 85 S.Ct. 440, 13 L.Ed.2d 544 (1964), appellants contend that the indictment in this case is multiplicious. In Pro-venzano the Government proceeded on a single-count indictment, on the theory that the series of payments over a number of years was th…
• United States v. Hedman, 630 F.2d 1184 (7th Cir. 1980)
  …Hobbs Act alleging a single, continuous plan of extortion with multiple payments begun outside the statute of limitations, but continuing to a date within the statute was upheld in United States v. Provenzano, 334 F. 2d 678 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 947, 85 S.Ct. 440, 13 L.Ed.2d 544 (1964). The evidence adduced at trial in this case showed that the appellants engaged in a single, continuous plan of extortion envisioning multiple payments over several years from each named company. These payments be…
• United States v. Hyde, 448 F.2d 815 (5th Cir. 1971)
  …vidence of Gantt receiving personal benefit is irrelevant. One need receive no personal benefit to be guilty of extortion; the gravamen of the offense is loss to the victim. United States v. Provenzano, 3 Cir. 1964, 334 F. 2d 678, 686, cert. denied, 379 U.S. 947, 85 S.Ct. 440, 13 L.Ed.2d 544. With respect to Counts Two and Four, Gantt participated in the extortion from Century Acceptance. It was Gantt who took the records from the office of Century Discount of Prichard and brought them to a hotel in Mobile…