ROBINSON

v.

ILLINOIS HIGH SCHOOL ASSOCIATION ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (104 total)

• United States v. Geaney, 417 F.2d 1116 (2d Cir. 1969)
  …ted proves to be insufficient to justify submitting to the jury the issue of defendant’s alleged guilty involvement with the declarant.” See also United States v. Borelli, 336 F. 2d 376, 387 (2 Cir. 1964), cert. denied, Cinquegrano v. United States, 379 U.S. 960, 85 S.Ct. 647, 13 L.Ed.2d 555 (1965); United States v. Corallo, 413 F. 2d 1306, 1324-1325 (2 Cir. 1969). To require that the independent proof necessary to admit utterances of one conspirator against another should be sufficient for submission of t…
• United States v. Carmine Tramunti, 513 F.2d 1087 (2d Cir. 1975)
  …y one conspiracy you must find the defendants not guilty.” This was held, 485 F. 2d at 497, not to be a prejudicial “all or nothing” charge condemned in United States v. Borelli, 336 F. 2d 376 (2d Cir. 1964), cert. denied, Mogavero v. United States, 379 U.S. 960, 85 S.Ct. 647, 13 L.Ed.2d 555 (1965), since it was made “perfectly clear to the jury that if each of the defendants was not a knowing participant in the single conspiracy he must be acquitted.” . Only Mamone complains of this marshaling upon appeal…
• United States v. Sperling, 506 F.2d 1323 (2d Cir. 1974)
  …ate consideration to the claims of eleven separate appellants.26 We hold that Judge Pollack’s charge on this issue clearly was appropriate and not contrary to our decision in United States v. Borelli, 336 F. 2d 376, 386 (2 Cir. 1964), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 960 (1965). He properly marshalled the evidence; explained in detail the essential elements of the crime of conspiracy; focused the jury’s attention on the importance of their determining whether each defendant joined the conspiracy and the scope of his…