BOESE ET AL.

v.

RANDOLPH-WELLS BUILDING CORP. ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Forrest Vill. Apts., Inc. v. The United States, 371 F.2d 500 (Ct. Cl. 1967)
  …unlawful in that it violated the Congressional mandate that prepayment charges must be “equitable” in amount. The court, on the basis of its decision in Camellia Apartments, Inc. v. United States, 334 F. 2d 667, 167 Ct.Cl. 224 (1964), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 963, 85 S.Ct. 653, 13 L.Ed.2d 557 (1965), entered an order on October 29, 1965 granting a motion by defendant for judgment on the pleadings and dismissing the petition.1 Forrest Village Apartments, Inc. v. United States, 173 Ct.Cl. 1179 (1965), cert. de…
• Grymes Hill Manor Ests. v. The United States, 373 F.2d 920 (Ct. Cl. 1967)
  …cided January 20, 1967; Forrest Village Apts., Inc. v. United States, 371 F. 2d 500, 173 Ct.Cl. 1179 (1965), cert. denied, 383 U.S. 943, 86 S.Ct. 1197 (1966); Camellia Apts., Inc. v. United States, 334 F. 2d 667, 167 Ct.Cl. 224 (1964), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 963, 85 S.Ct. 653, 13 L.Ed. 2d 557 (1965). OPINION OF COMMISSIONER* MALETZ, Commissioner: Section 603(c) of the National Housing Act (12 U.S.C. § 1738(c) (1958)) authorizes the Commissioner of the Federal Housing Administration to fix a premium charg…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Barrington Manor Apts. Corp. v. The United States, 459 F.2d 499 (Ct. Cl. 1972)
  …the regulation quoted above.2 Plaintiff concedes, as it must, that it does not come within the literal terms of this portion of the regulation. See Camellia Apts., Inc. v. United States, 334 F. 2d 667, 672, 167 Ct.Cl. 224, 231 (1964), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 963, 85 S. Ct. 653, 13 L.Ed.2d 557 (1965); Forrest Village Apts., Inc. v. United States, 371 F. 2d 500, 504, 178 Ct.Cl. 490, 497 (1967). Plaintiff’s claim is that: 12 U.S.C. 1738(c) authorizes prepayment penalties only in an amount that is “equitable”,…