BRUNO ET AL.

v.

PENNSYLVANIA

Citator

Cited By (26 total)

• United States v. Kelly, 349 F.2d 720 (2d Cir. 1965)
  …hase of the case, it is not error to refuse to repeat substantially the same or a different statement of the same principles of law in the language submitted by counsel. United States v. Press, 2 Cir., 1964, 336 F. 2d 1003, 1015, cert. denied, 1965, 379 U.S. 965, 85 S.Ct. 658,13 L.Ed.2d 559; United States v. Haskell, 2 Cir., 1964, 327 F. 2d 281, 286, cert. denied, 377 U.S. 945, 84 S.Ct. 1351, 12 L.Ed.2d 307; United States v. Gaydos, 2 Cir., 1962, 310 F. 2d 883; Windisch v. United States, 5 Cir., 1961, 295 F…
• United States v. Glaziou, 402 F.2d 8 (2d Cir. 1968)
  …s it is true that the reading of the indictment to the jury could result in an overemphasis of the importance of the indictment and consequently could mislead the jurors, United States v. Press, 336 F. 2d 1003, 1016-1017 (2 Cir. 1964), cert, denied, 379 U.S. 965, 85 S. Ct. 658, 13 L.Ed.2d 559 (1965) but this was not so here. The judge, immediately upon being informed of his error, instructed the impaneled jurors at the voir dire that the indictment was only an accusation and that the jurors should not consi…
• United States v. Hoffa, 367 F.2d 698 (7th Cir. 1966)
  …identifying the substantive charges against each defendant, and adverts to the unquestioned rule that a jury may be entitled to have the indictment during its deliberations, citing United States v. Press, 336 F. 2d 1003 (2d Cir. 1964), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 965, 85 S.Ct. 658, 13 L.Ed.2d 559 (1965). These observations are irrelevant. The point which the majority fails to emphasize is that the indictment was transmitted to the jury in response to a request which was ambiguous at best, and was accompanied by…