ALLEN ET AL.

v.

DAVID ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (22 total)

• Muniz v. Hoffman, 422 U.S. 454 (U.S. 1975)
  …his Court, to give particular force to the many express disavowals in the House and Senate Reports of any intent to effect substantive changes in the law. Madden v. Grain Elevator, Flour & Feed Mill Workers, 334 F. 2d 1014 (CA7 1964), cert. denied, 379 U. S. 967 (1965) (§10 (l) proceeding); Schauffler v. Local 1291, International Longshoremen’s Assn., 189 F. Supp. 737 (ED Pa. 1960), rev’d on other grounds, 292 [*475] F. 2d 182 (CA3 1961) (§ 10 (Z) proceeding). See United States v. Robinson, 449 F. 2d 925 (C…
• Am. Radio Assn., Afl-Cio v. Mobile S.S. Assn., Inc., 419 U.S. 215 (U.S. 1974)
  …as jurisdiction under § 8 (b) (4) of domestic secondary activities which are in commerce, even though the primary employer is located outside the United States. See Madden v. Grain Elevator Workers Local 418, 334 F. 2d 1014 (CA7 1964), cert. denied, 379 U. S. 967 (1965); Grain Elevator Workers Local 418 v. NLRB, 126 U. S. App. D. C. 219, 376 F. 2d 774, cert. denied, 389 U.S. 932 (1967). The definition appears in 29 U. S. C. § 152 (2): “(2) The term ‘employer’ includes any person acting as an agent of an em…
• Squillacote v. Local 248, 534 F.2d 735 (7th Cir. 1976)
  …hat general agency standards do not apply to the contempt action but rather the more stringent standards of the Norris-LaGuardia Act apply. 29 U.S.C. § 106. In Madden v. Grain Elevator Workers Local 418, 334 F. 2d 1014 (7th Cir. 1964), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 967, 85 S.Ct. 661, 13 L.Ed.2d 560 (1965), this court applied the analysis that the Supreme Court recently adopted in Muniz v. Hoffman, supra, to reject such a conclusion. In United Mine Workers v. Gibbs, 383 U.S. 715, 86 S.Ct. 1130, 16 L.Ed.2d 218 (1966…