GREAT ATLANTIC & PACIFIC TEA CO., INC.

v.

ATCHISON, TOPEKA & SANTA FE RAILWAY CO.

Citator

Cited By

• Grain Elevator v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 376 F.2d 774 (D.C. Cir. 1967)
  …ovided, That nothing contained in this clause (B) shall be construed to make unlawful, where not otherwise unlawful, any primary strike or primary picketing; . Madden v. Grain Elevator, etc., Local 418, 334 F. 2d 1014 (7th Cir. 1964), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 967, 85 S.Ct. 661, 13 L. Ed.2d 560 (1965). . Grain Elevator Workers Local 418 and Continental Grain Co., 155 N.L.R.B. 402 (1965). At the time of filing its charge with the Board against Local 418, Continental made the same charge against Seafarers’ Int…
• Castleberry v. Alcohol, 530 F.2d 672 (5th Cir. 1976)
  …lac, it was not, of course, in the course of their official duties. Proper jurisdiction would then be in the state courts in an action such as replevin, detinue, or perhaps trover.4 Allen v. David, 5 Cir. 1964, 334 F. 2d 592, 599, cert. denied 1965, 379 U.S. 967, 85 S.Ct. 660, 13 L.Ed.2d 560. On the other hand, if defendants were acting in an official capacity when they took the car, then the suit is actually one against the United States, and perhaps barred by sovereign immunity. See Larson v. Domestic and…