MATTHEWS ET VIR

v.

SOUTHERN PACIFIC CO.

Citator

Cited By (22 total)

• Nuesse v. Camp, 385 F.2d 694 (D.C. Cir. 1967)
  …d this issue.5 While another circuit has indicated that it would not permit a banking commissioner to make this claim, see South Dakota v. National Bank of South Dakota, 219 F.Supp. 842 (D.S.D.1963), aff’d 335 F. 2d 444 (8th Cir. 1964), cert. denied 379 U.S. 970, 85 S.Ct. 667, 13 L.Ed.2d 562 (1965), we agree with the later opinion of Chief Judge Tuttle holding the contrary. See Jackson v. First National Bank of Valdosta, 349 F. 2d 71 (5th Cir. 1965). The question is whether the Commissioner has an “interes…
• United States ex rel. George Hart v. Davenport, 478 F.2d 203 (3d Cir. 1973)
  …ottery offenses proscribed by N.J.Stat:Ann. § 2A: 121-3. The former is the making or taking and recording or registering of bets or wagers on races and other sporting contests. State v. Romeo, 43 N.J. 188, 207, 203 A. 2d 23, 33 (1964), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 970, 85 S.Ct. 668, 13 L.Ed.2d 563 (1965). The latter statute defines as separate offenses possession of lottery slips, N.J.Stat.Ann. § 2A: 121-3(b), working for a lottery operator, N.J.Stat.Ann. § 2A:121-3(a), and being the owner of a building or plac…
• S. M. Wilson & Co. v. Smith Int'l, Inc., 587 F.2d 1363 (9th Cir. 1978)
  …leaves a portion of it useless, inexplicable, inoperative, meaningless or achieves a whimsical result. State of Arizona v. United States, 575 F. 2d 855, 863 (Ct.Cl.1978); Texaco, Inc. v. Holsinger, 336 F. 2d 230, 235 (10th Cir. 1964), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 970, 85 S.Ct. 669, 13 L.Ed.2d 563 (1965). The untenable result which follows from a construction which places installation within the ambit of “workmanship” can best be avoided through a recognition that installation and “workmanship” are entirely dis…