NEW YORK STOCK EXCHANGE

v.

LEGATE; AND LEGATE V. MALONEY, RECEIVER

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Popejoy, 578 F.2d 1346 (10th Cir. 1978)
  …evidence on a crucial element of the offense — defendant Popejoy’s knowledge of the other parties’ participation in the robbery. See United States v. Press, 336 F. 2d 1003, 1013 (2d Cir’), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 965, 85 S.Ct. 658, 13 L.Ed.2d 559 and 379 U.S. 973, 85 S.Ct. 658, 13 L.Ed.2d 559. We must agree that the statement of the agent’s impression was inadmissible. It would have been far better if the Government had avoided bringing it in. However, there was a prompt rejection of the statement by the cou…
• Legate v. Maloney, 348 F.2d 164 (1st Cir. 1965)
  …on to recall mandate on the ground of error in our opinion, reported 334 F. 2d 704. Movant is New York Stock Exchange, hereinafter the Exchange. Review was previously sought, unsuccessfully, by petition for rehearing, and by petition for certiorari, 379 U.S. 973, 85 S.Ct. 664, 13 L.Ed.2d 564. Some months after the latter denial the Exchange filed the present motion, citing cases that had been decided in other circuits subsequent to our refusal of rehearing. As recited in our earlier opinion, the Securities…
• English v. United States, 620 F.2d 150 (7th Cir. 1980)
  …stify in his own behalf because of the prospect of cross-examination by former counsel then representing adverse interests [of co-defendants].” United States v. Press, 336 F. 2d 1003, 1017 (2nd Cir. 1964), cert, denied sub nom. Fry v. United States, 379 U.S. 973, 85 S.Ct. 670, 13 L.Ed.2d 563, reh. den. 380 U.S. 927, 85 S.Ct. 887, 13 L.Ed.2d 815 (1965). The Second Circuit noted that the defendant did not complain of the representation he did have, had not objected to his former attorney’s withdrawal, and th…