ROHR

v.

NEW YORK

Citator

Cited By

• Pope v. United States, 372 F.2d 710 (8th Cir. 1967)
  …onduct. * * * The definition of insanity, as embodied in the instructions of the trial Court following Coffman, incorporated all of the elements of the A.L.I.Code”. See, also, Fitts v. United States, 325 F. 2d 1021, 1022 (10 Cir. 1964), cert. denied 379 U.S. 979, 85 S.Ct. 682,13 L.Ed.2d 569; Otney v. United States, 340 F. 2d 696, 699 (10 Cir. 1965); Gessner v. United States, 354 F. 2d 726, 729 (10 Cir. 1965). Little would be accomplished by listing here the approaches to the problem in the various state co…
• Precious H. Caskey v. The Vill. OF Wayland & the Est. of Charles E. Rose, 375 F.2d 1004 (2d Cir. 1967)
  …ges consider the judgment scanty or believe that they would have awarded a larger sum had they tried the case. See Dagnello v. Long Is. R. R. Co., 289 F. 2d 797, 806 (2d Cir. 1961); Nussbaum v. Warehime, 333 F. 2d 462 (7th Cir. 1964), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 979, 85 S.Ct. 682, 13 L.Ed.2d 570 (1965). It is not our function to second guess the jury. Nevertheless, “[w]here the verdict returned by a jury is palpably and grossly inadequate or excessive, it-should not be permitted to stand,” Dimick v. Schiedt, 2…
• James v. Copinger, 428 F.2d 235 (4th Cir. 1970)
  …Hunt v. Warden, Md.Pen., 335 F. 2d 936 (4th Cir. 1964); Donnell v. Nash, 323 F. 2d 850 (8th Cir. 1963), cert. denied, 376 U.S. 924, 84 S.Ct. 686, 11 L.Ed.2d 619 (1964); Mahurin v. Nash, 321 F. 2d 662 (8th Cir. 1963), cert. denied, Mahurin v. Carter, 379 U.S. 979, 85 S.Ct. 682, 13 L.Ed.2d 569 (1965); Comment, Habeas Corpus — Effect of Supreme Court Change in Law on Exhaustion of State Remedies Requisite to Federal Habeas Corpus, 113 U.Pa.L.Rev. 1303 (1965); cf. In Re Whittington, 391 U.S. 341, 88 S.Ct. 1507,…