CAMPBELL

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (20 total)

• United States v. McLERNON, 746 F.2d 1098 (6th Cir. 1984)
  …f shotgun in private hands is not an intrinsically innocent object. The possession of it is a serious crime, except under extraordinary circumstances.” 521 F. 2d at 1177 (quoting Porter v. United States, 335 F. 2d 602, 607 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 983, 85 S.Ct. 695, 13 L.Ed.2d 574 (1964)). In direct contrast to the seizure in Gray, the seizure in Truitt was performed in a situation in which probable cause was both “immediate” and “apparent” to the officers from the intrinsically incriminating nat…
• United States v. Rahn, 511 F.2d 290 (10th Cir. 1975)
  …s residence. Lucarz v. United States, supra. The affidavit need not contain information providing “. . . certainty that the objects sought will be found as a result of the search.” Porter v. United States, 335 F. 2d 602 (9th Cir. 1964), cert. den’d, 379 U.S. 983, 85 S.Ct. 695, 13 L.Ed.2d 574 (1965). As appellant points out, the affidavit does not contain anyone’s observation of the property at the residence; that missing information, however, is not fatal to a determination that probable cause existed to s…
• United States v. Garafolo, 385 F.2d 200 (7th Cir. 1967)
  …e admission of the evidence to establish that the communication was intercepted in violation of § 605. Nardone v. United States, 308 U.S. 338, 339, 60 S.Ct. 266, 84 L.Ed. 307 (1939); United States v. Campbell, 7 Cir, 337 F. 2d 396 (1964), cert. den, 379 U.S. 983, 85 S.Ct. 694, 13 L.Ed.2d 573 (1965). If one of the parties consents to the monitoring of the communication, there is no “interception” and evidence of the contents of the communication is admissible. Rathbun v. United States, 355 U.S. 107, 78 S.Ct.…