FINNELL
v.
BROMBERG

U.S. | 1965-01-25
No. 670
379 U.S. 988 Supreme Court of the United States (1965) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Carpet Seaming Tape Licensing Corp. v. Best Seam Inc., 616 F.2d 1133 (9th Cir. 1980)
    …ized legitimate purpose for a pooling agreement is exchange of blocking patents. Standard Oil Co. v. United States, 283 U.S. 163, 51 S.Ct. 421, 75 L.Ed. 926 (1931); International Mfg. Co. v. Landon, Inc., 336 F. 2d 723 (9th Cir. 1964), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 988, 85 S.Ct. 701, 13 L.Ed.2d 610 (1965); Cutter Laboratories v. Lyophile-Cryochem Corp., 179 F. 2d 80 (9th Cir. 1949). The trial court’s sixth conclusion of law demonstrates a misunderstanding as to the nature of the relationship between two patents w…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw