CADENA
v.
WASHINGTON ET AL.; FARRANT V. BENNETT, WARDEN, ET AL.; GONZALEZ V. DEPARTMENT OF WELFARE, CITY OF NEW YORK; AND CORBIN V. MYERS, CORRECTIONAL SUPERINTENDENT
CADENA
WASHINGTON ET AL.; FARRANT V. BENNETT, WARDEN, ET AL.; GONZALEZ V. DEPARTMENT OF WELFARE, CITY OF NEW YORK; AND CORBIN V. MYERS, CORRECTIONAL SUPERINTENDENT
379 U.S. 995
Supreme Court of the United States (1965)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Case v. Nebraska, 381 U.S. 336 (U.S. 1965)….2 The State conceded in its response to the petition for certiorari that habeas corpus was unavailable to hear petitioner’s claim and that petitioner had no other remedy in the state courts.3 On oral argument, counsel appointed for petitioner, see 379 U. S. 995, conceded the relevancy of the new Nebraska postconviction procedure,4 but contended that petitioner [*342] was nevertheless entitled to a declaration that he had been unconstitutionally denied a hearing by the Nebraska courts, and to a reversal of…