CITY OF CORONADO ET AL.

v.

SAN DIEGO UNIFIED PORT DISTRICT ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Shapiro v. Thompson, 394 U.S. 618 (U.S. 1969)
  …or can I understand the Court’s implication, ante, at 638, n. 21, that other state residence requirements such as those employed in determining eligibility to vote do not present constitutional questions. Despite the fact that in Drueding v. Devlin, 380 U. S. 125 (1965), we affirmed an appeal from a three-judge District Court after the District Court had rejected a constitutional challenge to Maryland’s one-year residence requirement for presidential elections, the rationale employed by the Court in these ap…
• Dunn v. Blumstein, 405 U.S. 330 (U.S. 1972)
  …n and the assertedly overriding interests served by it must meet close constitutional scrutiny.” Evans v. Cornman, supra, at 422; see Bullock v. Carter, ante, p. 134, at 143. [*337] Tennessee urges that this case is controlled by Drueding v. Devlin, 380 U. S. 125 (1965). Drueding was a decision upholding Maryland’s durational residence requirements. The District Court tested those requirements by the equal protection standard applied to ordinary state regulations: whether the exclusions are reasonably rela…
• Hall et ux. v. Beals, 396 U.S. 45 (U.S. 1969)
  …f last resort for challenge^ of relatively short state residency requirements. Those courts may, as the District Court apparently did in this case, consider them [*52] selves bound by this Court’s summary per curiam affirmance in Drueding v. Devlin, 380 U. S. 125 (1965), aff’g 234 F. Supp. 721 (D. C. Md. 1964), which upheld a one-year residency requirement for voting in a presidential election. It seems to me clear that Drueding is not good law today. The difficulties of achieving review in this Court in ca…