HALL
v.
ILLINOIS

U.S. | 1965-03-08
No. 848
380 U.S. 250 Supreme Court of the United States (1965) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Lesley v. State OF Okla. & Ray H. Page, 407 F.2d 543 (10th Cir. 1969)
    …right to counsel and waiver, see Westbrook v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 150, 86 S.Ct. 1320, 16 L.Ed.2d 429 (1966). On retroactivity, see Gideon v. Wainwright, supra; Doughty v. Maxwell, 376 U.S. 202, 84 S.Ct. 702, 11 L.Ed.2d 650 (1964); Arthur v. Colorado, 380 U.S. 250, 85 S.Ct. 943, 13 L.Ed.2d 818 (1965); Linkletter v. Walker, 381 U.S. 618, 85 S.Ct. 1731, 14 L.Ed.2d 601 (1965) ; Burgett v. Texas, 389 U.S. 109, 88 S.Ct. 258, 19 L.Ed.2d 319 (1967). It seems that retroactive effect will be applied when the facts cl…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw