DAVIS, ASSESSOR-COLLECTOR OF TAXES, BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS, ET AL.
v.
MABRY ET AL.
DAVIS, ASSESSOR-COLLECTOR OF TAXES, BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS, ET AL.
MABRY ET AL.
380 U.S. 251
Supreme Court of the United States (1965)
Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 13 L. Ed. 2d 818 · 85 S. Ct. 936 · 1965 U.S. LEXIS 1671 · SCDB 1964-061
Cited by 3 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.
The judgment is affirmed. Carrington v. Rash, ante, p. 89.
Mr. Justice Harlan would reverse the judgment of the District Court for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in Carrington v. Rash, ante, at 97.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Premium Serv. Corp. v. The Sperry & Hutchinson Co., 511 F.2d 225 (9th Cir. 1975)…very. St. Regis Paper Co. v. United States, 368 U.S. 208, 219, 82 S.Ct. 289, 7 L.Ed.2d 240 (1961); Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. Hughes, 29 F.R.D. 523 (S.D. N.Y.1961), aff’d, 332 F. 2d 602 (2d Cir. 1964), cert. dismissed, 380 U.S. 249, 85 S.Ct. 934, 13 L.Ed.2d 818 (1965). Nevertheless, a public policy against unnecessary public disclosure arises from the need, if the tax laws are to function properly, to encourage taxpayers to file complete and accurate returns. Federal Savings & Loan Ins. Corp. v. Krueger,…
-
Lesley v. State OF Okla. & Ray H. Page, 407 F.2d 543 (10th Cir. 1969)…see Westbrook v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 150, 86 S.Ct. 1320, 16 L.Ed.2d 429 (1966). On retroactivity, see Gideon v. Wainwright, supra; Doughty v. Maxwell, 376 U.S. 202, 84 S.Ct. 702, 11 L.Ed.2d 650 (1964); Arthur v. Colorado, 380 U.S. 250, 85 S.Ct. 943, 13 L.Ed.2d 818 (1965); Linkletter v. Walker, 381 U.S. 618, 85 S.Ct. 1731, 14 L.Ed.2d 601 (1965) ; Burgett v. Texas, 389 U.S. 109, 88 S.Ct. 258, 19 L.Ed.2d 319 (1967). It seems that retroactive effect will be applied when the facts clearly justify such application…
-
Brooks v. Hilton Casinos Inc., 959 F.2d 757 (9th Cir. 1992)…by careful exercise of judicial discretion to assure that its imposition is merited,” quoting Trans World Airlines v. Hughes, 332 F. 2d 602, 614 (2d Cir.1964), cert. dism’d, 380 U.S. 248, 85 S.Ct. 934, 13 L.Ed.2d 817 and 380 U.S. 249, 85 S.Ct. 934, 13 L.Ed.2d 818 (1965).). . The court, rather than the jury, made this factual finding because the court awarded compensation for lost retirement benefits as an equitable remedy in the Title VII action, after the jury verdicts came in. CR 493, at 2-3. The court de…