HARRISON
v.
MCNAMARA, SECRETARY OF DEFENSE, ET AL.
HARRISON
MCNAMARA, SECRETARY OF DEFENSE, ET AL.
380 U.S. 261
Supreme Court of the United States (1965)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Rodriguez v. Seamans, 463 F.2d 837 (D.C. Cir. 1972)….Ct. 909, 912, 95 L.Ed. 1317, rehearing denied, 342 U.S. 843, 72 S.Ct. 21, 96 L.Ed. 637 (1951). “[T]he truthfulness of a man is material in estimating his reliability.” Harrison v. McNamara, 228 F.Supp. 406, 408 (D.Conn., 1964), affirmed per curiam, 380 U.S. 261, 85 S.Ct. 954, 13 L.Ed.2d 960 (1965). While it is axiomatic that the Government cannot discharge an employee on either arbitrary or discriminatory grounds, Slochower v. Board of Higher Education, 350 U.S. 551, 76 S.Ct. 637, 100 L.Ed. 692 (1956); W…
-
Rigoberto Melendez v. Shultz, 486 F.2d 1032 (1st Cir. 1973)…§ 2282. Schneider v. Smith, 390 U.S. 17, 88 S.Ct. 682, 19 L.Ed.2d 799 (1968) ; Federal Housing Administration v. The Darlington, Inc., 352 U.S. 977, 77 S.Ct. 381, 1 L.Ed.2d 363 (1957) ; Harrison v. McNamara, 228 F.Supp. 406 (D.C.Conn. 1964), aff’d, 380 U.S. 261, 85 S.Ct. 954, 13 L.Ed.2d 960 (1965).…