ABERNATHY ET AL.
v.
ALABAMA

U.S. | 1965-04-05
No. 9
Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice White took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
380 U.S. 447 Supreme Court of the United States (1965) Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 14 L. Ed. 2d 151 · 85 S. Ct. 1101 · 1965 U.S. LEXIS 1485 · SCDB 1964-089
Cited by 18 cases

Per_curiam
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

The judgments are reversed. Boynton v. Virginia, 364 U. S. 454.

Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice White took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Callendar v. State, 181 So. 2d 529 (Fla. 1966)
    …Ed. 2d 265. Decided April 26, 1965): “The petition for writ of certiorari is granted and the judgments are reversed. Boynton v. Com. of Virginia, 364 U.S. 454, 81 S.Ct. 182, 5 L.Ed.2d 206; Abernathy v. State of Alabama, 380 U.S. 447, 85 S.Ct. 1101, 14 L.Ed.2d 151.” Upon receiving the Mandate of the Supreme Court of the United States in these causes we entered an order remanding them to the District Court of Appeal, First District, with instructions that they in turn be remanded to the circuit court and then…
  • Callendar v. State, 184 So. 2d 656 (Fla. 1st DCA 1966)
    …upreme Court in the following words: “The petition for writ of certiorari is granted and the judgments are reversed. Boynton v. Com. of Virginia, 364 U.S. 454, 81 S.Ct. 182, 5 L.Ed.2d 206, Abernathy v. State of Alabama, 380 U.S. 447, 85 S.Ct. 1101, 14 L.Ed.2d 151.” On June 30, 1965, the Florida Supreme Court issued its per curiam order remanding said causes to this court with directions that it in turn remand them to the Circuit Court of the Fifth Judicial Circuit of Florida with directions to that court to…
    1 / 2
  • …tes, N.D.Calif., 1964, 228 F.Supp. 690, aff’d per curiam, 379 U.S. 132, 85 S.Ct. 274, 13 L.Ed.2d 333; Chicago, Milwaukee, St. P. & P. R. Co. v. United States, E.D.Wis., 1963, 214 F. Supp. 244, reversed on other grounds, 380 U.S. 448, 85 S.Ct. 1102, 14 L.Ed.2d 151; State of Georgia v. United States, N.D.Ga., 1957, 156 F.Supp. 711, aff’d per curiam, 356 U.S. 273, 78 S.Ct. 771, 2 L.Ed.2d 760. With the way open for direct review of the validity of the Commission’s order in a statutory three judge court, the que…

Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw