CHICAGO & NORTH WESTERN RAILWAY CO.

v.

CHICAGO, MILWAUKEE, ST. PAUL & PACIFIC RAILROAD CO. ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Tampa Phosphate R.R. Co. v. Seaboard Coast Line R.R. Co., 418 F.2d 387 (5th Cir. 1969)
  …Pacific R. Co. v. United States, N.D.Calif., 1964, 228 F.Supp. 690, aff’d per curiam, 379 U.S. 132, 85 S.Ct. 274, 13 L.Ed.2d 333; Chicago, Milwaukee, St. P. & P. R. Co. v. United States, E.D.Wis., 1963, 214 F. Supp. 244, reversed on other grounds, 380 U.S. 448, 85 S.Ct. 1102, 14 L.Ed.2d 151; State of Georgia v. United States, N.D.Ga., 1957, 156 F.Supp. 711, aff’d per curiam, 356 U.S. 273, 78 S.Ct. 771, 2 L.Ed.2d 760. With the way open for direct review of the validity of the Commission’s order in a statu…
• Lucas v. People OF the State OF Mich., 420 F.2d 259 (6th Cir. 1970)
  …v. Blessing, 378 Mich. 51, 142 N.W. 2d 709 (1966), cert. denied 387 U.S. 914, 87 S.Ct. 1692, 18 L.Ed.2d 637; In re Winkle, 372 Mich. 292, 125 N.W. 2d 875 (1964), cert. denied 379 U.S. 645, 85 S.Ct. 611, 13 L.Ed.2d 551, rehearing denied 380 U.S. 967, 85 S.Ct. 1102, 14 L.Ed.2d 157; People v. Harper, 365 Mich. 494, 113 N.W. 2d 808 (1962). “The Michigan Court of Appeals has in several cases held or implied that [*262] the exception is valid. See People v. Monroe, 3 Mich.App. 165, 141 N.W. 2d 679 (1966); People…
• NEW Orleans Terminal Co. & S. Pac. Co. v. Spencer, 366 F.2d 160 (5th Cir. 1966)
  …pinion, the Supreme Court said: “The judgment is reversed. Texas & P. R. Co. v. Gulf C. & S.F. R. Co., 270 U.S. 266, 278 [46 S.Ct. 263, 266, 70 L.Ed. 578].” Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad Co., 380 U.S. 448, 85 S.Ct. 1102, 14 L.Ed.2d 151, reh. den. 381 U.S. 907, 85 S.Ct. 1445, 14 L.Ed.2d 289. The district court, in the case before us, noted that the reference in the Supreme Court’s per curiam reversal was to a page of the report of the Texas & Pacific…

Authorities Cited

• Tex. & Pac. Ry. Co. v. Gulf, 270 U.S. 266 (U.S. 1926)