MCKINNIE ET AL.
v.
TENNESSEE

U.S. | 1965-04-05
No. 148
380 U.S. 449 Supreme Court of the United States (1965) Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 14 L. Ed. 2d 151 · 85 S. Ct. 1101 · 1965 U.S. LEXIS 1487 · SCDB 1964-091
Cited by 2 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

The judgment is reversed. Hamm v. City of Rock Hill and Lupper v. Arkansas, 379 U. S. 306.

Mr. Justice Stewart would vacate the judgment and remand the case to the Supreme Court of Tennessee for reconsideration in the light of supervening federal legislation, in accordance with the views expressed in his dissenting opinion in Hamm v. City of Rock Hill, 379 U. S. 306, 326.

Mr. Justice Black, Mr. Justice Harlan, and Mr. Justice White would affirm the judgment of the Supreme Court of Tennessee for the reasons stated in their dissenting opinions in Hamm v. City of Rock Hill, 379 U. S. 306, 318, 322, 327.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Drews v. Maryland, 381 U.S. 421 (U.S. 1965)
    …her stood near the door. They were convicted under a statute making it a crime to enter upon the lands of another without a license after being forbidden to do so. We held that the Civil Rights Act abated their convictions. In McKinnie v. Tennessee, 380 U. S. 449, the petitioners, eight Negroes, entered the vestibule of a restaurant, were refused entrance into the restaurant proper, whereupon they remained in the vestibule, which measured 6' x 6' 4", for approximately 20 minutes. There was testimony that the…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw