METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE CO.
v.
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD

U.S. | 1965-04-26
No. 229
380 U.S. 525 Supreme Court of the United States (1965) Positive Treatment
Cited by 12 cases

Per_curiam
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment of the Court of Appeals is vacated and the case remanded to that court with instructions to remand it to the National Labor Relations Board for further proceedings consistent with the opinion of this Court in Labor Board v. Metropolitan Ins. Co., ante, p. 438. The judgment shall issue forthwith.

It is so ordered.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • …523, 85 S.Ct. 1325, 14 L.Ed.2d 265, reversing 328 F. 2d 820 (3rd Cir.); Western & Southern Life Ins. Co. v. N. L. R. B., 380 U.S. 522, 85 S.Ct. 1326, 14 L.Ed.2d 265, reversing 328 F. 2d 891 (3rd Cir.); Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. v. N. L. R. B., 380 U.S. 525, 85 S.Ct. 1326, 14 L.Ed.2d 265, reversing 330 F. 2d 62 (6th Cir.). Examining the determination of the Board in the instant case, we find a striking parallel. The Regional Director made his determination on the appropriateness of a single unit on th…
  • …oard has acted arbitrarily or violated the statute, May Department Stores Co. v. N. L. R. B., 326 U.S. 376, 380, 66 S.Ct. 203, 90 L.Ed. 145 (1945); Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. v. N. L. R. B„ 330 F. 2d 62 (6th Cir. 1964) vacated on other grounds, 380 U. S. 525, 85 S.Ct. 1326, 14 L.Ed.2d 265. (1965); N. L. R. B. v. Swift & Co., 292 F. 2d 561 (1st Cir.1961); N. L. R. B. v. Esquire, Inc., 222 F. 2d 253 (7th Cir.1955). Whether or not an employee is a supervisor is a question of fact. The determination of the…
  • Yoshio Uyeda v. Brooks, 365 F.2d 326 (6th Cir. 1966)
    …it in contravention of a specific prohibition of the Act. [*330] Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co. v. N.L.R.B., 313 U.S. 146, 61 S.Ct. 908, 85 L.Ed. 1251 (1941); Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. N.L.R.B., 330 F. 2d 62 (6th Cir. 1964) vacated on other grounds, 380 U.S. 525, 85 S.Ct. 1326, 14 L.Ed.2d 265 (1965). Here the use of the family relationship was in determining the brother’s eligibility for participation in the bargaining unit, not his status as an “employee” under Section 2(3). While the exclusion from the b…
    1 / 2

Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw