SHUTTLESWORTH

v.

CITY OF BIRMINGHAM

Citator

Cited By

• Carnation Co. v. Pacific Westbound Conference, 383 U.S. 213 (U.S. 1966)
  …urt granted the motion. The Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed the dismissal of the action on the ground that such an action cannot be maintained until the Commission has passed upon the agreements, 336 F. 2d 650. We granted certiorari, 380 U. S. 905, and hold that the implementation of rate-making agreements which have not been approved by the Federal Maritime Commission is subject to the antitrust laws. The Shipping Act contains an explicit provision exempting activities which are lawful unde…
• Gunther v. San Diego & Ariz. E. Ry. Co., 382 U.S. 257 (U.S. 1965)
  …ontract and its decision on the merits of the dispute. 336 F. 2d 543. We granted certiorari because the holding of the two courts below seemed, in several respects, to run counter to the requirements of the Railway Labor Act as we have construed it. 380 U. S. 905. I. Section 3 First (i) of the Railway Labor Act provides that “disputes between an employee or group of [*261] employees and a carrier or carriers growing out of grievances or out of the interpretation or application of agreements” are to be handl…
• Shuttlesworth v. City of Birmingham, 382 U.S. 87 (U.S. 1966)
  …1 So. 2d 796, and the Supreme Court of Alabama declined review. 276 Ala. 707, 161 So. 2d 799. We granted certiorari to consider the petitioner’s claim that under the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution his conviction cannot stand. 380 U. S. 905. The two ordinances which Shuttlesworth was charged with violating are §§ 1142 and 1231 of the Birmingham General City Code. The relevant paragraph of § 1142 provides: “It shall be unlawful for any person or any number of persons to so stand, loite…