SAM'L D. JORDAN, AS CLERK, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, EX REL. FRED H. DAVIS, AS ATTORNEY GENERAL, ET AL., DEFENDANTS IN ERROR
SAM'L D. JORDAN, AS CLERK, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR,
STATE OF FLORIDA, EX REL. FRED H. DAVIS, AS ATTORNEY GENERAL, ET AL., DEFENDANTS IN ERROR
100 Fla. 493
Florida Supreme Court (1930)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
— This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby,; affirmed.
*494Whitfield, P. J., and Strum and Buford, J. J., concur.
Terrell, C. J., and Brown, J., concur in the decision and judgment.
Ellis, J., dissents.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Robinson v. Fla. Dry Cleaning & Laundry Bd., 141 Fla. 899 (Fla. 1940)…t considered or determined by Court when the Act was before the Court as shown by the cases, supra. Counsel contends that additional constitutional questions, not previously considered, can be presented and relies upon Jordan v. State ex rel. Davis, 100 Fla. 493, 128 So. 35; DiLustro v. Penton, 106 Fla. 198, 142 So. 898; State ex rel. Fulton v. Ives, 123 Fla. 401, 167 So. 394, and other cited authorities. It is contended that certain grants of power to the laundry board on the part of the Legislature rende…