GORECKI

v.

BURKE, WARDEN

Citator

Cited By (22 total)

• DeSTEFANO v. Woods, 392 U.S. 631 (U.S. 1968)
  …imprisonment. The Oregon Constitution, Art. I, §11, permits a jury [*632] to convict in noncapital cases if 10 of the 12 jurors support conviction. The Oregon Supreme Court affirmed petitioner’s conviction. 238 Ore. 208, 390 P. 2d 923, cert. denied, 380 U. S. 923. In 1967, petitioner sought collateral relief under Oregon’s post-conviction statute. The sole ground relied upon was that the State and Federal Constitutions were violated when the jury was told it could return a verdict of guilty even though the m…
• Lovelace v. United States, 357 F.2d 306 (5th Cir. 1966)
  …ignment by a judicial officer is to inform the accused “without unnecessary delay” of his privilege against self incrimination, Greenwell v. United States, 119 U.S.App.D.C. 43, 336 F. 2d 962, 966 (D.C.Cir. 1964), cert. denied, Greenwell v. Anderson, 380 U.S. 923, 85 S.Ct. 921, 13 L.Ed.2d 807 (1965); cf. United States v. Middleton, 344 F. 2d 78, 82 (2d Cir. 1965), it is clear that the defendant could not have been prejudiced by the alleged delay without his demonstrating that evidence was extracted from him…
• United States v. Vilhotti, 452 F.2d 1186 (2d Cir. 1971)
  …part of interstate commerce as required by the statute. United States v. Gollin, 166 F. 2d 123 (3d Cir. 1947), cert. denied, 333 U.S. 875, 68 S.Ct. 905, 92 L.Ed. 1151 (1948) ; see United States v. Berger, 338 F. 2d 485 (2d Cir. 1964), cert. denied, 380 U.S. 923, 85 S.Ct. 925, 13 L.Ed.2d 809 (1965) ; United States v. Cousins, 427 F. 2d 382, 385 (9th Cir. 1970). . The distinction between the general criminal intent necessary for the completed act of monopolization under Section 2 of the Sherman Act and the…