CASE

v.

NEBRASKA

Citator

Cited By

• Leary v. United States, 383 F.2d 851 (5th Cir. 1967)
  …concealed marihuana, being a transferee required to pay a transfer tax, in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 4744 (a), is invalid. This Circuit has had occasion to rule on this precise point in Haynes v. United States, 5 Cir., 1964, 339 F. 2d 30, cert. den. 380 U.S. 924, 85 S.Ct. 926, 13 L.Ed.2d 809 (1965), in which the court found no merit to the contention “that the appellant was required to incriminate himself by registration and payment of taxes and, hence, that the statutes under which he was convicted are unc…
• Stiltner v. Rhay, 371 F.2d 420 (9th Cir. 1967)
  …on, a court having jurisdiction over the subject matter. Plaintiff’s conviction was later reversed on the ground that the trial judge’s ruling constituted an abuse of discretion. State v. Stiltner, 61 Wash.2d 102, 377 P. 2d 252 (1962), cert. denied, 380 U.S. 924, 85 S.Ct. 928, 13 L.Ed.2d 810. . Under exceptional circumstances the failure to provide or permit access to medical care may rise to Fourteenth Amendment proportions. For example, in Coleman v. Johnston, 247 F. 2d 273 (7th Cir. 1957), allegations t…
• Leary v. United States, 392 F.2d 220 (5th Cir. 1968)
  …without having paid the tax or having secured the Treasury written order forms. We reaffirm our prior ruling on this issue (based on several former decisions of this Court, namely, Haynes v. United States, 5 Cir., 1964, 339 F. 2d 30, cert. denied, 380 U.S. 924, 85 S.Ct. 926, 13 L.Ed.2d 809 (1965); Rule v. United States, 5 Cir., 1966, 362 F. 2d 215; and Manning v. United States, 5 Cir., 1960, 274 F. 2d 926) that the statutory provisions relating to marihuana (26 U.S.C. §§ 4741(a), 4742 and 4744(a)) which r…