MCCOY
v.
RANDOLPH, WARDEN; EPPS V. NEW YORK; ARBUCKLE V. ILLINOIS; WILLIAMSON ET AL. V. GILMER ET AL.; SCOTT V. ANDERSON, JAIL SUPERINTENDENT; HLOZANSKY V. COX, PENITENTIARY SUPERINTENDENT; FARRELL V. BURKE, WARDEN; HICKOCK V. CROUSE, WARDEN; SMITH V. CROUSE, WARDEN; GRATTER V. NASH, WARDEN; LEEPER V. ANDERSON, JAIL SUPERINTENDENT; HYMES V. DUNBAR, CORRECTIONS DIRECTOR, ET AL.
MCCOY
RANDOLPH, WARDEN; EPPS V. NEW YORK; ARBUCKLE V. ILLINOIS; WILLIAMSON ET AL. V. GILMER ET AL.; SCOTT V. ANDERSON, JAIL SUPERINTENDENT; HLOZANSKY V. COX, PENITENTIARY SUPERINTENDENT; FARRELL V. BURKE, WARDEN; HICKOCK V. CROUSE, WARDEN; SMITH V. CROUSE, WARDEN; GRATTER V. NASH, WARDEN; LEEPER V. ANDERSON, JAIL SUPERINTENDENT; HYMES V. DUNBAR, CORRECTIONS DIRECTOR, ET AL.
380 U.S. 928
Supreme Court of the United States (1965)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 10 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Williams v. Beto, 354 F.2d 698 (5th Cir. 1965)…ient has no right to complain of the absence of a miracle. Hickock v. Crouse, (10 Cir., 1964), 334 F. 2d 95, cert. den. 379 U.S. 982, 85 S.Ct. 689, 13 L.Ed.2d 572, and Smith v. Crouse, 379 U.S. 982, 85 S.Ct. 690, 13 L.Ed.2d 572, reh. den. two cases, 380 U.S. 928, 85 S.Ct. 908, 13 L.Ed.2d 817. It is the duty of every court, state or federal, fearlessly to see that the attorney is faithful to his trust. Courts will not shirk this duty. On the other hand, we must have no qualms about rejecting the ill founded…
-
Cross Johnson, Jr. v. United States, 380 F.2d 810 (10th Cir. 1967)…., 379 F. 2d 20, No. 9104; Nutt v. United States, 10 Cir., 335 F. 2d 817, cert. denied, 379 U.S. 909, 85 S.Ct. 203, 13 L.Ed.2d 180; Hickock v. Crouse, 10 Cir., 334 F. 2d 95, cert. denied, 379 U.S. 982, 85 S.Ct. 689, 13 L.Ed.2d 572, rehearing denied, 380 U.S. 928, 85 S.Ct. 908, 13 L.Ed.2d 817; Johnson v. United States, 10 Cir., 333 F. 2d 371; Frand v. United States, 10 Cir., 301 F. 2d 102.…
-
Poulson v. Turner, 359 F.2d 588 (10th Cir. 1966)…guaranteed by the Constitution. Latham v. Crouse, 10 Cir., 320 F. 2d 120, cert. denied 375 U.S. 959, 84 S.Ct. 449, 11 L.Ed.2d 317. In Hickock v. Crouse, 10 Cir., 334 F. 2d 95, 100, cert. denied 379 U.S. 982, 85 S.Ct. 689, 13 L.Ed.2d 572, reh. denied 380 U.S. 928, 85 S.Ct. 908, 13 L.Ed.2d 817, we said: “While the power of a federal court in a habeas corpus proceeding is great indeed, the narrow limits of its jurisdiction within which that power may be exercised when reviewing a state court conviction cannot…
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence