PAN AMERICAN-GRACE AIRWAYS, INC., ET AL.

v.

CIVIL AERONAUTICS BOARD ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Anne C. Martindell v. Int'l Tel. & Tel. Corp., 594 F.2d 291 (2d Cir. 1979)
• PAN Am. World Airways, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Bd., 392 F.2d 483 (D.C. Cir. 1968)
  …e order,” 184 F. 2d at 71, leaving open the question of what the court would have done had the Board acted beyond its lawful authority. See also Pan American-Grace Airways, Inc. v. C. A. B., 119 U.S.App.D.C. 326, 342 F. 2d 905 (1964), cert. denied, 380 U.S. 934, 85 S.Ct. 941, 13 L.Ed.2d 821 (1965) ; Alaska Airlines, Inc. v. Pan American World Airways, Inc., 116 U.S.App.D.C. 128, 321 F. 2d 394 (1963) ; British Overseas Airways Corp. v. C. A. B., 113 U.S.App.D.C. 76, 304 F. 2d 952 (1962). See generally Mill…
• In re Beef Indus. Antitrust Litig. Neal Smith v. The Nat'l Provisioner Inc., 589 F.2d 786 (5th Cir. 1979)
  …43 F. 2d 224. Other courts have been willing to ignore technical defects in the intervention process. E. g., United States v. Louisiana, 5 Cir. 1976, 543 F. 2d 1125; Smartt v. Coca-Cola Bottling Corp., 6 Cir. 1964, 337 F. 2d 950, cert. denied, 1965, 380 U.S. 934, 85 S.Ct. 941, 13 L.Ed.2d 822. Occasionally, courts have been willing to overlook a total failure to comply with Rule 24(c). E. g., SEC v. Lincoln Thrift Association, 9 Cir. 1978, 577 F. 2d 600; Roach v. Churchman, 8 Cir. 1972, 457 F. 2d 1101. Th…