ROMANO ET AL.

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Scotto, 641 F.2d 47 (2d Cir. 1980)
  …ot raised below and no such instruction was requested. Moreover, nothing in the language of § 186 requires knowledge that what one is receiving is a “thing of value.” But see United States v. Holt, 333 F. 2d 455, 456-57 (2d Cir. 1964), cert. denied, 380 U.S. 942, 85 S.Ct. 1020, 13 L.Ed.2d 961 (1965) (instruction upheld requiring knowledge that § 186(b) payment was a thing of value and that it was being given by an employing company to a union leader). All that is required is an awareness of the benefit itse…
• Blassie v. The Kroger Co., 345 F.2d 58 (8th Cir. 1965)
  …stablished only for purposes which Congress considered proper and expended only for the purposes for which they were established.” [footnotes omitted] See also United States v. Roth, 333 F. 2d 450, 453 (2 Cir. 1964), petition for certiorari denied, 380 U.S. 942, 85 S.Ct. 1020; Sanders v. Birthright, 172 F.Supp. 895, 901 (S.D.Ind.1959); United States v. Brennan, 134 F.Supp. 42, 47 (D.Minn. 1955). Status to Appeal. We were initially concerned as to whether Blassie’s and Etzel’s removal and replacement depri…
• United States v. Kramer, 355 F.2d 891 (7th Cir. 1966)
  …under Rule 23(a) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure Title 18 U.S.C.A. Singer v. United States, 380 U.S. 24, 85 S.Ct. 783, 13 L.Ed.2d 630 (1965); and see United States v. Igoe, 118 U.S.App.D.C. 30, 331 F. 2d 766 (7th Cir. 1964), cert. denied 380 U.S. 942, 85 S.Ct. 1020, 13 L.Ed.2d 961. Instructions The trial court did not give a requested definition of interstate commerce which was substantially similar to that of the Hobbs Act, but left the determination of the existence of this element to the jur…