BLAKE

v.

WAINWRIGHT, CORRECTIONS DIRECTOR

Citator

Cited By

• Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kan. City, 383 U.S. 1 (U.S. 1966)
  …the inventor. By cross-action, Cook Chemical claimed infringement. The actions were consolidated for trial and the patent was sustained by the District Court. 220 F. Supp. 414. The Court of Appeals affirmed, 336 F.'2d 110, and we granted certiorari, 380 U. S. 949. We reverse. Manifestly, the validity of each of these patents turns on the facts. The basic problems, however, are the same in each case and require initially a discussion of the constitutional and statutory provisions covering the patentability o…
• United States v. Adams, 383 U.S. 39 (U.S. 1966)
  …he contract claims as well. 165 Ct. Cl., at 598. The United States sought certiorari on the patent validity issue only. We granted the writ, along with the others, in order to settle the important issues of patentability presented by the four cases. 380 U. S. 949. We affirm. I. While this case is controlled on the merits by No. 11, Graham, ante, p. 1, respondents have raised threshold issues as to our jurisdiction which require separate handling. They say that the petition for certiorari came too late, co…
• Bros Inc. v. W. E. Grace Mfg. Co. & William E. Grace, 351 F.2d 208 (5th Cir. 1965)
  …ully all will soon know whether that patent is or is not valid when the Supreme Court articulates the standards, as it is bound to do in deciding the above case and Calmar, Inc. v. Cook Chemical Co., 8 Cir., 1964, 336 F. 2d 110, cert. granted, 1965, 380 U.S. 949, 85 S.Ct. 1082, 13 L.Ed.2d 967; and Adams v. United States, Ct. Claims, 1964, 330 F. 2d 622, cert. granted, 1965, 380 U.S. 949, 85 S.Ct. 1090, 13 L.Ed.2d 968. . 85 U.S.C.A. § 102: “A person shall be entitled to a patent unless — * * * (b) the inven…

  ← 1 / 2 →