GRAHAM

v.

CALIFORNIA

Citator

Cited By (12 total)

• Ohio-Sealy Mattress Mfg. Co. v. Sealy, 585 F.2d 821 (7th Cir. 1978)
  …tying arrangement where a “tying” company has absolutely no financial interest in the sales of a third company whose products are favored by the tie-in. Crawford Transport Company v. Chrysler Corporation, 338 F. 2d 934 (6th Cir. 1964), cert. denied, 380 U.S. 954, 85 S.Ct. 1088, 13 L.Ed.2d 971 (1965); Keener v. Sizzler Family Steak Houses, 1977-2 Trade Cases ¶ 61,-682 at 72,800 (N.D.Tex.1977); Rodrigue v. Chrysler Corporation, 421 F.Supp. 903 (E.D. La.1976). Here, however, it is undisputed that Sealy recei…
• The Venzie Corp. v. United States Mineral Prods. Co., Inc., 521 F.2d 1309 (3d Cir. 1975)
  …the “tied” product or was not at least receiving a commission on sales of the product.5 Our research has revealed only cases holding to the contrary. See, e. g., Crawford Transport Co. v. Chrysler Corp., 338 F. 2d 934 (6th Cir. 1964), cert. denied, 380 U.S. 954, 85 S.Ct. 1088, 13 L.Ed.2d 972 (1965); Miller Motors Inc. v. Ford Motor Co., 252 F. 2d 441 (4th Cir. 1957). The record in this case fails to establish any effort by Mineral to use its economic position as the manufacturer of DC/F to invade and domi…
• Yentsch v. Texaco, Inc., 630 F.2d 46 (2d Cir. 1980)
  …t. denied, 440 U.S. 930, 99 S.Ct. 1267, 59 L.Ed.2d 486 (1979); Venzie Corp. v. United States Mineral Products Co., 521 F. 2d 1309, 1317-18 (3d Cir. 1975); Crawford Transport Co. v. Chrysler Corp., 338 F. 2d 934, 938-39 (6th Cir. 1964), cert. denied, 380 U.S. 954, 85 S.Ct. 1088, 13 L.Ed.2d 971 (1965). Nevertheless, we do not decide today whether to incorporate this element into our tying analysis, since appellee’s claim fails on another ground. . One commentator has criticized Fortner II, on the ground tha…