HARTGRAVES

v.

ILLINOIS

Citator

Cited By (17 total)

• Ginzburg v. United States, 383 U.S. 463 (U.S. 1966)
  …received mailed matter, either one of three publications challenged as obscene, or advertising telling how and where the publications might [*465] be obtained. The Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit affirmed, 338 F. 2d 12. We granted certiorari, 380 U. S. 961. We affirm. Since petitioners do not argue that the trial judge misconceived or failed to apply the standards we first enunciated in Roth v. United States, 354 U. S. 476,3 the only serious question is whether those standards were correctly applied.4…
• United States v. Cone, 354 F.2d 119 (2d Cir. 1965)
  ….Ed.2d 702 (1965); State v. Neely, 239 Or. 487, 395 P. 2d 557 (1964); and State v. Dufour, 206 A. 2d 82 (R.I.1965) (alternative holding). Among those decided the other way are People v. Hartgraves, 31 Ill.2d 375, 202 N.E. 2d 33 (1964), cert. denied, 380 U.S. 961, 85 S.Ct. 1104, 14 L.Ed. 2d 152 (1965); Commonwealth v. Tracy, 207 N.E. 2d 16 (Mass.1965); People v. Gunner, 15 N.Y.2d 226, 257 N.Y.S.2d 924 (1965); Parker v. Warden, 236 Md. 236, 203 A. 2d 418 (1964); and State v. Winsett, 205 A. 2d 510 (Super.Ct.D…
• United States v. Klaw, 350 F.2d 155 (2d Cir. 1965)
  …rted, Crim.Ct. City of New York, 1964 (appeal pending); Attorney General v. Book Named “John Cleland’s Memoirs of a Woman of Pleasure,” Mass., 206 N.E. 2d 403 (1965). Compare United States v. Ginzburg, 338 F. 2d 12, 14 (3d Cir. 1964), cert. granted, 380 U.S. 961, 85 S.Ct. 1103, 14 L.Ed.2d 152 (1965) (No. 807), 1964 Term, renumbered No. 42, 1965 Term. Nor is mere “patent offensiveness” enough. There must in addition be the requisite prurient appeal. Assuming that “prurient appeal” can be adequately defined,…